Robots Over Eurasia

In order to understand the ongoing crisis in Ukraine, it is crucial to grasp the key players and plans in the global chess game.  In the last hundred years, the world has been dominated by the Anglo-American imperium.  The British “Great Game” of keeping Russia at bay was a torch passed on to the American establishment following the Bolshevik Revolution (sponsored by Western banks, including Paul Warburg in particular), as the British shadow establishment contented itself by ruling America from afar, through its Pratt House and Council on Foreign Relations versions of the Royal Society Round Table.  From this behemoth came the OSS and CIA, as well as covert support for Sovietism, as demonstrated from the CFR’s own history.

Britain thus pioneered the practice of containment, the strategy of tension, and overt infiltration and subversion of Russia through its own exported Kulturkampf, Marxism.   As Russian civilization labored under the burden of Sovietism, the West enlisted its best and brightest in a grand propaganda campaign known as the Cold War.   At a higher level, the goal was always convergence between the West and the East, as the polar opposites merged into a single globo-state, synthesizing the worst of the communist and capitalist systems.  The Cold War therefore allowed the Western military-industrial complex the onus to work towards its great project: the Skynet/DARPA grid that would come online as a result of endless black-budget funding from various covert programs.  For proof of this, one need look no further than the computer screen in front them, wired to the internet – DARPA’s master creation.  As DARPA’s own history shows, the creation of the Internet was always a spying tool of the Western military industrial intelligence establishment through Harvard, RAND, AT&T, Xerox, the NSA and London.  Consider as well that even decades ago, the plan was to link the “NET” to satellites (Skynet).  When Russian President Vladimir Putin recently said the Internet was a CIA creation, he was 100% correct.

DARPA states as follows concerning its creation and reason for existence:

The Soviet Union’s launch of Sputnik showed that a fundamental change was needed in America’s defense science and technology programs. DARPA was formed to meet this need and rejuvenated our defense technological capabilities.

The 1977 ARPANET, precursor to the Internet, connected to RAND, Harvard, Stanford, London, etc., and the satellite grid.

The 1977 ARPANET, precursor to the Internet, connected to RAND, Harvard, Stanford, London, etc., and the satellite grid.

The greatest of those projects (along with the Manhattan Project from World War II) would be the secret space program hatched at Bohemian Grove and known as the Strategic Defense Initiative.  SDI, or Star Wars for short, would see countless billions siphoned off of the taxpayers’ backs into endless black holes of research and development.  In order to justify the intelligence state and its hi-tech black budget operations, a great enemy was needed.  That enemy continued to be the Russians, as American establishment elites justified their Faustian bargain with techno-obsession through the “Left” Marxist Russian adversary.  Just as the British created a Wahhabi power and jihadism through the letters and works of Sir Lawrence of Arabia, so too did the American establishment manufacture the same threat with Al Qaeda in 1979.   Brzezinski explains of the creation of Al Qaeda and the Mujahadeen:

 Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [From the Shadows], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Brzezinski was channeling Lawrence of Arabia.

British Intelligence expert Mark Curtis gives the background to the Great Game:

The British strategy of divide and rule, and reliance on Muslim forces to promote imperial interests, reached its apogee in the Middle East during and after the First World War.  The carving up of the region by British and French officials has been endlessly commented on – though less so as an illustration of the long-standing British ‘use’ of Islam, which then took a new turn.  The Middle East was seen by British planners as critical for both strategic and commercial reasons.  Strategically, the Islamic territories were important buffers against Russian expansion into the Imperial land route from British India to British-controlled Egypt.  But oil had by now also entered the  picture, with the founding of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Corporation in Persia in 1909, the discovery of oil in Iraq soon after, and its increasingly important role in powering the military during the First World War.  British planners viewed control over Iraqi and Persian oil to be a ‘first class British War aim.’ (Curtis, Secret Affairs, 5)

Indeed, we now see why the West has always been a secret patron of the radical Islam it professes to hate.  The British Government itself wrote to the Sauds (future heads of the British-created “nation,” Saudi Arabia):

‘If the Amir [i.e. Hussein] … and Arabs in general assist Great Britain in the conflict that has been forced upon us by Turkey, Great Britain will promise not to intervene in any manner whatsoever whether in things religious or otherwise … Till now we have defended and befriended Islam in the person of the Turks; henceforward it shall be in that of the noble Arab.  It may be that an Arab of true race will assume the Khalifate at Mecca or Medina, and so good may come by the help of God out of all the evil that is now occurring.’ (Curtis, 8)

The parallels with Brzezinski and Al Qaeda are unmistakable.  The same design of funding both sides of a conflict while propagandizing the masses at home continues unabated.  Britain knew the Turks could not be controlled, so a plan was hatched to try to control a Khalifate through the Sauds and thereby control all of Islam.  In other words, the Anglo establishment has long utilized modern Islamic radicalism for the purpose of creating a buffer zone between it and Russia in the Middle East.  Brzezinski writes in his well-known 1997 book The Grand Chessboard of the same goals regarding Russia in our day:

Understandably, the immediate task has to be to reduce the probability of political anarchy or a reversion to a hostile dictatorship in a crumbling state still possessing a nuclear arsenal.  But the long-range task remains: how to encourage Russia’s democratic transformation and economic recovery while avoiding the reemergence of the Russian Empire that could obstruct the American Geo-strategic goal … But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. (The Grand Chessboard, 87).

The “democratic transformation” Brzezinski writes of is found in the phony, Western-funded NGOs that have sparked a host of “color revolutions” over the last few decades in the Middle East and former Soviet space.  The goal is thus to flank Russia and eventually “democratize” and McDonalidize that nation and all Eurasia even further through perpetual social disorder, collapse, and GMO cheeseburgers, just as the United States itself undergoes tyrannical “democratization” from its degenerate so-called elite.  Brzezinski’s strategy to transform Russia at the beginning of the 90s resulted in the Yeltsin regime, wherein a host of former Communist Party oligarchs looted the nation through the Clinton Administration’s IMF “aid.”  This “aid” resulted in $500 billion being looted from the Russian people, as well as the collapse of the Russian economy.   The same Clintonistas who organized this debacle through organized (international) crime also concocted the banker bailout of recent infamy through perpetually repackaged derivatives scams.

What, then, is the connection between Ukraine, DARPA, Al Qaeda and Russia’s “Time of Troubles” in the 1990s?  Precisely this: the Anglo-US/EU/NATO axis is employing the same methodology of destabilization and subversion in Ukraine as it did over the last century – in order to undermine Russia.  The dread antagonists the Anglo axis creates are shadow enemies – enemies of its own Manichaean machinations.  Without a great foe (built up by the West itself), the basis for the Skynet control grid could not be justified.  So whether the bogus nemesis is radical Islam in the form of Al Qaeda, or Sovietism in the form of the evil, godless Russians of Reagan propaganda, the reality is that the West loves its supposed enemies.  Without them, the liberal-democratic (read crony capitalists peddling cultural Marxism) world order could not exist, due to its negative view of the state and amorphous view of “liberty” and “freedom.”  Generic, revolutionary “liberty” and “freedom” from tends to equal de facto slavery and bondage to international monetarism and mystical market materialism.

The strategy of the West in the Great Game has not changed one iota.  What has changed is the method of employing those plans, which will eventually be channeled into the use of their secret weapon: Skynet.  However, the real enemy is not Moscow.  The masters of propaganda and media subterfuge have unleashed a hellstorm of psy-ops and trickery as of late, all with the intention of reviving the Cold War canard, as if “Russia” were looking to subjugate the “free peoples of the West.”  Meanwhile, the West slides into total collapse, as the same IMF shock doctrine of derivatives, debt and fiat-money scams destroy America and Europe in exactly the same way Russia was looted twenty years prior.

When the created bubble pops, Wall Street and its NGOs swoop in like vultures to snatch up a given country’s assets in the engineered “fire sale.”  NATO is running the same operation in Ukraine, with the intention of splitting the nation for its coming banker austerity.  As the destabilization continues to take effect, the same pattern becomes clear – the IMF will offer loans as the guarantee of a “stabilized” economy.  Then, Ukraine will be looted and billions siphoned off, or in this case, at least the western half.  Whether it’s Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Greece, Georgia or Ukraine, the same economic and political instability with branded color revolutions and IMF looting occurs like clockwork.  Yet with Ukraine, as well as with Africa and AFRICOM, the goal is not Kony or some other fake oppressor, but natural resources and military bases.  The regions in question are prime targets for extracting oil, natural gas, and rare earth minerals, just as the British plan of a 100 years ago stated regarding Iraq.   Nothing has changed.

The West’s ace in the hole is Skynet.  SDI’s ultimate purpose was to create a great global grid of technological surveillance and control that would encompass every area of life.  Full-spectrum dominance became full-spectrum surveillance.  If the recent revelations about the NSA show anything, they demonstrate that the DARPA/SDI plan of global techno-control never ended or abated, but rather, world government through scientific technocracy was always the objective.  And Luciferian luminaries of the Anglo establishment like Bertrand Russell always said that was the goal.  Aldous and T.H. Huxley made very clear the vision of the Fabian Socialist one-worlders: a technocracy.  The long-term goals of the countless think tanks and environmental planners thus converge – to make all the chess moves necessary to eliminate Russia as a potential opposition force.  With Russia’s nationalism destroyed, the nationalism of all nation states would give way through cultural disintegration (cultural Marxism) to the World State.  The World State will then go under Skynet: the global AI control grid, where human error will supposedly no longer be a factor.

Remember the rad eighties? SDI, or "Star Wars" for short.

Remember the rad eighties? SDI, or “Star Wars” for short.

In the meantime, we must endure endless childish propaganda on the “news” about how Russia is marching toward World War III.  On the contrary, Russia is not the enemy.  The enemy is our own degenerate elite, who openly say they want all humanity dead.  The Anglo global master class want Russians dead as much as they want fat, dumb Americans dead.  They seek only radical population reduction (read: genocide) and technocracy.  And the Cold War is what allowed them to build the infrastructure for that technocracy.  From Sir Lawrence of Arabia to Al Qaeda, from the Soviet threat to Ukraine, the endgame is always the same: stop Russia from ever posing a threat to the New World Order, which is really nothing more than a repackaged version of the old British world order, yet far worse.  It is a world order intent on putting robots not just over Russian skies, but over all our skies.  And as the robots fly, the demonic transhumanist delusions of genocidal Anglo elites will climax as their kill grid goes online, unless Russia rises to the task of waking the world to the technocrats’ Great Game.

Read Jay Dyer’s insights on geopolitics, metaphysics, popular culture and philosophy at Jay’s Analysis.